Who wants to die for multi-culturalism?

How much difference is there between the suicide bomber who says "I Will" and the army recruit who ways "I Will if I have to?" That's what he is actually saying when he raises his hand to uphold and defend the Constitution. If he didn't volunteer but is made to hold up his hand there is a big difference. However the results are the same for him. But if he is under the sway of Patriotism and does this voluntarily he essentially is doing what the suicide bomber is doing by putting himself in the hands of others who tell him it is his time to die. But you can't say that if the soldier is a conscript. When I wrote the letter to the draft board I didn't think of it that way. That wasn't in my mind but that is what I actually did. I had no intention of dieing. Didn't want to die. This came to me in the Replacement Depot in Verifiers Belgium. You are just one of hundreds here and your fate is in the hands of others. You are a nothing. You wouldn't have to be here in far off Belgium if Roosevelt had thought of these things when he cut off oil for Japan and put sanctions on Japan that he knew Japan could not live with? That there would be war. He had no consideration for the individual. That's how lots of people are. They care for the masses, not the individual. But the masses are made up of individuals.


To die for something is to die for your race, your family, your buddies in combat. But not for multi-culturism no. No one wants to die for multi-culturism. No matter how great they say multi-culturism is they have to come up with something else. At the moment it is terrorism. Even that isn't working any more. Financial incentives are being tried. It seems even that is failing to bring in enough neo-suicide bomber soldiers.

Some people might not like this suggestion. How different is the Patriot and the suicide bomber? They both offer up their life. The Patriot lift's his hand and sweares to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. That means he puts himself in the hands of someone who can say "you do this" "this" might mean comitting some act that you might come back from. About 266 men and women did this per day for 4 years. They didn't want to. They didn't mean to. They would have preferred to live. They didn't live though. They raised their hand and offered themselves up for a cause. They died just as surely as the suicide bomber died. So what is the big difference? In the days of white surpremacy and quest for empire they believed it might be worth it. Now in the days of multurculterism the government has to come up with a new reason for people to offer to die for them. That is what it really amounts to. Why should someone offer to get themselves killed for the comfort of someone else? At the moment it is terrorism.


That you, the soldier was just an insignificant cog seemed to come to me in the replacement depot in Vieviers Belgium. Of the hundreds there do you think Roosevelt cared a whit? No, you were picked for something by some clerk in some office who to them was just another number. You were nothing. A military commander cant think of you as an individual and also be a military commander. If he really had reservations about sending men to die for someone else. (the people who started the war) I don't think he could command.

For about 1000 days 266 men and women per DAY were shot, stabbed, blown up, drowned, died of illness and a thousand others ways there is to die. That's a day I'm talking about. For a thousand days. 266. Think of it. In 5 years they managed to kill less than 4,000 men and women in Iraq. Hardly anyone brings out the awful carnage of WW2. They call it "The Good War" They don't think of the 266 Americans per day who were killed for Roosevelt's folly. They've made it out if it was somehow worth it. But those people are still alive who push this idea. They are not dead.